Skip to content

Game Theory Law

People, logic, data, law in the global technocracy.

Common Goals Not Necessarily Needed for a Win-Win Negotiation

adastralaw · March 11, 2016

Knowing each party’s interests and designing options that satisfy those interests can lead to a win-win outcome even when common goals are not present in a negotiation: http://bit.ly/1RgvgSZ

Brought to you by:

Recent Posts

  • Do Not Negotiate in these Eight Situations
  • Game Theory Analysis of Trade War: Defecting from Political Tradition
  • Washington Supreme Court Strikes Down Trade Secret by Ride-sharing Companies
  • One Negotiation, Three Small Mistakes, and Resulting Litigation
  • Three Strategic Patent Considerations for New Software Innovators and Policy Leaders

Recent Comments

  • adastralaw on One Negotiation, Three Small Mistakes, and Resulting Litigation
  • M on Is a Do-Nothing Legislature Really that Bad? Game Theory, Law, Complexity, and Deadlock.
  • Players Only: Thinking About Who’s Who in Your Economic Sand Box - Game Theory Law on Overwhelmed with Options in a Deal: An Easy Way to Focus Your Efforts on What Really Matters

Archives

  • March 2019
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017
  • February 2017
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • December 2015
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • June 2015
  • April 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015

Categories

  • Finance
  • Game Theory
  • Intellectual Property
  • Negotiation
  • Privacy
  • Technology
  • Technology Procurement
  • Trademark
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Powered by WordPress.