Skip to content

Game Theory Law

People, logic, data, law in the global technocracy.

Tactics in the Technocracy: Tactic 6 – The Ask

adastralaw · February 21, 2017

Happy New Year to my readers. It has been a busy few months of travel, so I am getting back to my posts in the run-up to the publication of my third book. This week we will look at asking or simply “the ask.” Many negotiations fail because people don’t, or incorrectly ask questions as […]

Tactics in the Technocracy: Tactic 5 – ASPD

adastralaw · September 29, 2016

You have been there: you find yourself having to do business with someone who is rude, cuts you off, breaks the rules, disregards things outside their immediate interests, wings it on deals they voraciously pursue, breaches contracts with abandon but demands trust, is unable to empathize, and is totally indifferent to your asks in a […]

Tactics in the Technocracy: Tactic 4 – Anger

adastralaw · September 21, 2016

It has been a busy few weeks, but I am getting back to my weekly posts. This week we will look at anger. Real or staged, anger is potentially effective in adversarial proceedings. It is detrimental and even fatal to cooperative arrangements. It is not to be used in business partnerships, joint ventures, serial negotiations, […]

Case Study on Large IT Government Projects

adastralaw · September 19, 2016

case-study-large-government-it-projects

Tactics in the Technocracy: Tactic 3 – Aim High

adastralaw · September 8, 2016

Aiming high is the standard of many an opener.  The “opener” is the first signal a negotiator is ready to negotiate. It may be in response to an offer (or a “counter offer”). Though this may seem easy, it may not only undermine your credibility, but also terminate the negotiation entirely if used incorrectly. If you […]

Living in a Negotiated World

adastralaw · September 3, 2016

When the emotions of fear or greed take over, things go awry in both private and public sector negotiation. War making is state action historically done for security; trade making is state action undertaken when mutual opportunity is sought. Ultimately, very powerful Super Sovereigns such as the European Union or the victors of World War […]

Tactics in the Technocracy: Tactic 2 Add Ons

adastralaw · August 29, 2016

The “add on” is a deal tactic that involves a small opener, such as a low price, and then adding essential elements to the deal that make the deal itself useful for both parties (these may or may not be assumed as part of the deal for example, product without shipping, eye glasses without scratch […]

Tactics in the Technocracy: Intro and Tactic 1: Ad Hominem Attacks

adastralaw · August 23, 2016

As a run up to the final stages to publication of my third book, Tactics in the Technocracy, I am posting a tactic, explaining, how it is used, and how to handle it. As my readers know, I look at a negotiation as three systems: strategic – things we do prior to the negotiation; operational – things […]

Have an upcoming negotiation?

adastralaw · July 18, 2016

Don’t wing it: http://ow.ly/fzYc302kNza

Negotiating with Crucial Clients

adastralaw · July 8, 2016

When negotiating with your most important customers, remember these strategies: http://ow.ly/6Ja93023vdL

Posts pagination

Previous 1 2 3 … 5 Next

Brought to you by:

Recent Posts

  • Do Not Negotiate in these Eight Situations
  • Game Theory Analysis of Trade War: Defecting from Political Tradition
  • Washington Supreme Court Strikes Down Trade Secret by Ride-sharing Companies
  • One Negotiation, Three Small Mistakes, and Resulting Litigation
  • Three Strategic Patent Considerations for New Software Innovators and Policy Leaders

Recent Comments

  • adastralaw on One Negotiation, Three Small Mistakes, and Resulting Litigation
  • M on Is a Do-Nothing Legislature Really that Bad? Game Theory, Law, Complexity, and Deadlock.
  • Players Only: Thinking About Who’s Who in Your Economic Sand Box - Game Theory Law on Overwhelmed with Options in a Deal: An Easy Way to Focus Your Efforts on What Really Matters

Archives

  • March 2019
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017
  • February 2017
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • December 2015
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • June 2015
  • April 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015

Categories

  • Finance
  • Game Theory
  • Intellectual Property
  • Negotiation
  • Privacy
  • Technology
  • Technology Procurement
  • Trademark
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Brought to you by:

Recent Posts

  • Do Not Negotiate in these Eight Situations
  • Game Theory Analysis of Trade War: Defecting from Political Tradition
  • Washington Supreme Court Strikes Down Trade Secret by Ride-sharing Companies
  • One Negotiation, Three Small Mistakes, and Resulting Litigation
  • Three Strategic Patent Considerations for New Software Innovators and Policy Leaders

Recent Comments

  • adastralaw on One Negotiation, Three Small Mistakes, and Resulting Litigation
  • M on Is a Do-Nothing Legislature Really that Bad? Game Theory, Law, Complexity, and Deadlock.
  • Players Only: Thinking About Who’s Who in Your Economic Sand Box - Game Theory Law on Overwhelmed with Options in a Deal: An Easy Way to Focus Your Efforts on What Really Matters

Archives

  • March 2019
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017
  • February 2017
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • December 2015
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • June 2015
  • April 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015

Categories

  • Finance
  • Game Theory
  • Intellectual Property
  • Negotiation
  • Privacy
  • Technology
  • Technology Procurement
  • Trademark
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Powered by WordPress.